Canadian Social Atmosphere Typology Consumer Information


1. Objective

The aim of this person information is to outline the idea of an identical Dissemination Space (DA) clusters used within the Canadian Social Atmosphere Typology (CanSET) and to provide an summary of how the clusters can be utilized to discover DA stage well being and social inequalities. Extra detailed technical info on the formation of the social setting clusters may be discovered within the Canadian Social Atmosphere Typology: Methodology Information developed by the well being inequality unit of the Centre for Inhabitants Well being Information (CPHD).  

2. Background

Lately there was a rising demand for related well being info at neighbourhood stage. Nonetheless, because of the lack of an obtainable classification method, it has been troublesome to match and distinction small areas inside a metropolis or among the many cities in Canada. To beat this shortcoming, the well being inequality unit of the Centre for Inhabitants Well being Information (CPHD) at Statistics Canada collaborated with the City Public Well being Community (UPHN) to develop a Dissemination Space (DA) classification method known as the Canadian Social Atmosphere Typology (CanSET). A technique information has been already in place, which describes the technical and methodological course of concerned within the growth of the CanSET (obtainable upon request). The principle targets of this doc is to provide primary info on how the CanSET was developed and in addition to offer element info on methods to use the CanSET classification to know space stage inequalities. 

The CanSET is a hierarchical clustering of DAs inside Canadian Census Metropolitan Areas (CMA)Be aware 1 and Census Agglomerations (CA).Be aware 2 The typology generated by means of this cluster evaluation may be taken as a social unit of study that signifies the geographic distribution of various sorts of mixtures of inhabitants traits all through CMAs and CAs. In different phrase, every social setting cluster consists of comparable DAs scattered throughout Canada. Due to this fact, the CanSET shouldn’t be defining neighbourhoods however defining areas of frequent social composition which can be fully totally different than the neighbourhoods outlined by totally different native authorities in Canada. The brand new CanSET knowledge can be utilized to raised perceive well being inequalities in relation to the composition of sub-city geographies in Canada.

The principle goal of this person information is to facilitate the reader on methods to use the brand new social setting clusters to know social and well being inequalities in additional populous areas in Canada.  The social setting clusters are developed by utilizing 30 totally different socioeconomic, demographic, and ethno-cultural variables from the 2016 Census aggregated on the DA stage. All of the variables for this product had been taken straight from the 2016 Census of Inhabitants microdata besides the inhabitants density variable, which was derived from Census of Inhabitants 2016 profile desk.

3. Makes use of of the Canadian Social Atmosphere Typology (CanSET)

The person stage socioeconomic, demographic and ethnocultural standing are helpful to know well being and social outcomes however are sometimes not obtainable in probably the most generally used dataset like surveys or administrative knowledge. Due to this fact, space primarily based socioeconomic and demographic measures have been extensively used to measure inequalities the place the person stage info is unavailable or exhausting to succeed in. Space stage evaluation helps to know whether or not residing in a socioeconomically deprived space provides further well being danger past the person stage socioeconomic standing.

The brand new CanSET portrays the complicated social composition of Canadian CMA and CA.  Not like the earlier research that targeted solely on marginalization or well being inequalities, the CanSET is extra complete because it consists of quite a lot of dimensions of city social setting and covers all populous areas of Canada. That is the primary evaluation to incorporate all DAs from the CMAs and CAs concurrently in a single typology moderately than analyzing them individually for every CMA or CA. As well as, it consists of the microdata from the Census of Inhabitants 2016 which covers all inhabitants of the research space. Due to this fact, the CanSET is essential for city analysis because it permits cities to make comparability inside themselves or with different cities and facilitates them to set benchmarks and observe progress in combating well being and social inequalities.

For example, in mild of the current COVID-19 pandemic, the CanSET knowledge can be utilized to know which social setting cluster is performing higher to attenuate the speed of an infection, hospitalization and mortality. It helps to know which components play essential position in figuring out well being behaviour and response methods throughout a pandemic just like the COVID-19.  This understanding might assist in the planning and allocating of sources which are required for particular sorts of communities.

4. Information used to create the CanSET 

Information chosen and analyzed for the CanSET was sourced from the Census of Inhabitants 2016 microdata for all of the DAs inside 35 CMAs and 117 CAs in Canada. The DA was used as a geographic unit of study. Statistics Canada defines a DA as a small, comparatively steady geographic unit composed of a number of adjoining dissemination blocks with a median inhabitants of 400 to 700 individuals (Statistics Canada, 2016). The DAs are the smallest geographic models for which Statistics Canada disseminates its Census knowledge for public use. The DAs are straightforward to combination small geographic models as they are often mixed to kind different bigger geographic models. Though there are 56,590 DAs in Canada (2016 Census Geography), solely the 43,144 DAs that belong to the CMAs or CAs had been included within the CanSET, primarily due to their excessive inhabitants densities, and in addition because of the availability of the variables of curiosity.

The DAs for which Census knowledge (i.e., both quick kind or lengthy kind) weren’t launched on account of confidentiality or knowledge high quality points weren’t included within the creation of the CanSET. The DAs related to Indian reserves had been excluded from the evaluation as a result of some Census questions had been both not requested or the ideas weren’t relevant or they had been incompletely enumerated. 





















Desk 1

Dissemination Space (DA), common inhabitants and households by provinces and territories

Desk abstract

This desk shows the outcomes of Dissemination Space (DA). The data is grouped by Province/Territory (showing as row headers), Complete variety of DAs, Variety of DAs in CanSET and Common inhabitants per DA (showing as column headers).
Province/Territory Complete variety of DAs Variety of DAs in CanSET Common inhabitants per DA
Newfoundland and Labrador 1,073 451 613
Prince Edward Island 295 152 563
Nova Scotia 1,658 986 610
New Brunswick 1,454 817 568
Quebec 13,658 10,544 627
Ontario 20,160 17,325 695
Manitoba 2,183 1,416 642
Saskatchewan 2,474 1,120 630
Alberta 5,803 4,282 774
British Columbia 7,617 5,984 678
Yukon 67 33 855
Northwest Territories 98 34 575
Nunavut 50 0 NA

5. Methodology

The CanSET was created utilizing hierarchal cluster evaluation of DAs into three ranges of nested social setting clusters.  Cluster evaluation makes an attempt to assign observations to teams (clusters) primarily based on their similarity or variations utilizing a measure of statistical (i.e., Euclidian) distance from one another. Observations inside every group are discovered to be just like each other with respect to variables or attributes of curiosity. In different phrases, the objective is to group the observations into homogeneous and distinct clusters. A hierarchical cluster evaluation methodology was utilized for cluster evaluation with a ‘Quick Ward’ choice in JMP® 13 (SAS Institute Inc., 2016) analytical software program. The Quick Ward methodology applies an algorithm that computes Ward’s methodology extra rapidly for big measurement knowledge, subsequently this methodology was used contemplating the info measurement for this evaluation. Particulars of the methodology may be discovered within the “Canadian Social Atmosphere Typology: Methodology Information”, obtainable upon request.

5.1 Variable Choice

The choice of variables was the results of a session with UPHN members. An in depth overview of the previous literature related to neighbourhood typology was additionally carried out earlier than choosing the variables. Variables describing the demographic, socioeconomic, and ethnocultural determinants of well being throughout the DAs throughout Canada had been used within the clustering algorithm to group comparable DAs. Numeric variables had been chosen that had been dependable and available from the Census of inhabitants 2016. The variables chosen for creating the CanSET cowl a variety of topics together with: demographic construction (age construction, household measurement, and so on.), socioeconomic standing (revenue, schooling, labour market standing, housing situation, and so on.) and ethno-cultural background standing (Aboriginal standing, immigration standing, seen minority standing, and so on.). Well being-related variables had been intentionally not used within the creation of the typology to make the typology equally relevant in different fields. Basic socioeconomic and demographic variables had been derived straight from the quick kind Census, whereas particular variable that weren’t obtainable briefly kind Census (e.g., stage of schooling, immigration standing, occupation and so on.) had been derived from the lengthy kind Census and weights had been utilized. Some variables had been obtainable at individual stage whereas others had been obtainable at census household, financial household or family stage. A preliminary checklist of 93 various variables had been chosen from the microdata of the Census of Inhabitants 2016. Nonetheless, after an in depth overview of the variables and after a spherical of preliminary evaluation, some variables that had been strongly correlated with one another had been excluded. As well as, some comparable variables had been grouped collectively that resulted into 30 ultimate variables as proven in Appendix A. All of the variables had been aggregated at DA stage geography and median values had been used.

The variables chosen for cluster evaluation had been measured on totally different scales, or on a typical scale with differing variances. Due to this fact, they had been standardized with a purpose to mitigate the impact of those variations among the many variables. All of the 30 variables had been standardized with imply 0 and variance 1 previous to performing the cluster evaluation. Some variables with extremely skewed distributions had been nonetheless a lot skewed even after normalization. So, all variables had been capped at their 99th percentile. 

5.2 Variety of Clusters

The optimum variety of clusters had been six, ten and twenty for the primary, second and third stage of hierarch respectively. The clusters are outlined because the set of DAs which are comparable when it comes to the chosen traits (variables).  Davies-Bouldin Index (DBI) for hierarchical clustering was used to find out the optimum variety of clusters nested in three hierarchical ranges. The smaller worth of the DBI means a greater clustering answer. Utilizing the DBI, three totally different optimum ‘ok’ values (variety of clusters) had been decided.

The optimum ‘ok’ values had been 6 within the vary of two to 9 clusters, 10 within the vary of 10 to 19 clusters and 20 within the vary of 20 to 30 clusters because the Davies-Bouldin index was the smallest for these options. Due to this fact, a nested hierarchy of six, ten and twenty clusters was created as outlined in Desk 2.












































Desk 2

Variety of optimum clusters within the CanSET by hierarchy

Desk abstract

This desk shows the outcomes of Variety of optimum clusters within the CanSET by hierarchy . The data is grouped by First stage clusters (showing as row headers), Complete variety of Dissemination Areas (showing as column headers).
First stage clusters Complete variety of Dissemination Areas
A 19,127
A1 6,650
A11 6,650
A2 7,170
A21 2,600
A22 3,349
A23 1,221
A3 5,307
A31 3,295
A32 2,012
B 10,914
B1 7,787
B11 4,553
B12 1,183
B13 2,051
B2 3,127
B21 1,215
B22 1,912
C 1,328
C1 1,328
C11 1,328
D 4,418
D1 4,418
D11 2,578
D12 887
D13 953
E 4,709
E1 4,709
E11 2,334
E12 847
E13 1,528
F 2,648
F1 1,388
F11 1,388
F2 1,260
F21 1,260

5.3 Cluster Names, Traits and Makes use of

Three ranges of nested clusters had been created for the CanSET utilizing hierarchical clustering methodology (Desk 2). The optimum variety of clusters had been decided at six, ten and twenty. The median values had been calculated for every variables for every cluster answer and particular traits had been developed primarily based on the place of the median worth of every cluster in a quintile distribution of all of the DAs within the evaluation.

The CanSET knowledge desk comes with Dissemination Space Distinctive ID (DAUID) and related cluster membership for every of the three cluster options. For instance, one DA might fall into cluster A once we use six cluster classification however the identical DA might fall into cluster A3 and A32 respectively for ten and twenty cluster classification. Customers can choose the cluster answer that distinguishes their space of curiosity and might use the respective worth to categorise the neighbourhoods. Customers can choose the cluster answer to make use of relying on the socioeconomic, demographic and ethno-cultural composition of a CMA or CA of curiosity. For example, if customers desires to make use of CanSET knowledge to know well being inequalities in giant CMAs like Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver, they might use all six, ten or twenty cluster options as all kind of DAs are current in giant CMAs having giant inhabitants. Nonetheless, just a few clusters sorts could also be current in small CMAs or CAs. In that case, they might find yourself utilizing solely six or ten clusters to match well being outcomes. 

5.3.1 Six clusters answer

Degree one of many hierarchy creates six clusters because the optimum cluster answer. The variety of DAs in every cluster ranges from 1,328 to 19,127 whereas the median inhabitants density ranges from 2,176 to eight,160 individuals per sq. kilometre. On this answer, every DA is given a worth of 1 to six primarily based on their cluster membership. Following are a few of the main traits of every cluster for this answer.














Desk 3

Identify and outline of first stage of clusters

Desk abstract

This desk shows the outcomes of Identify and outline of first stage of clusters. The data is grouped by Cluster Quantity (showing as row headers), Cluster Identify and Cluster Description (showing as column headers).
Cluster Quantity Cluster Identify Cluster Description
Cluster 1 A DAs on this cluster have medium inhabitants density however increased than common variety of individuals per family; decrease than common proportion of single dad or mum households; excessive proportion of households with a college diploma at bachelor’s stage or above; low unemployment fee and better than common family revenue; increased than common proportion of individuals in managerial or skilled occupations; excessive dwelling possession fee and low proportion of households in want of main restore.
Cluster 2 B DAs on this cluster have comparatively low inhabitants density; decrease than common variety of individuals per family however increased than common proportion of single dad or mum households; very low proportion of households with a college diploma at bachelor’s stage or above; very low proportion of current immigrant inhabitants however increased than common proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; comparatively excessive proportion of labour drive in manufacturing, and gross sales and repair occupation; comparatively low median dwelling worth and low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 3 C DAs on this cluster have very small family measurement; very low proportion of inhabitants underneath the age of 14 years however very excessive proportion of aged inhabitants aged 65 years and above; very excessive proportion of institutionalized inhabitants; very excessive proportion of low revenue households; very excessive proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; low dwelling possession fee; and really low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 4 D DAs on this cluster have very excessive inhabitants density and really low proportion of youngsters 14 years of age and underneath; very small family measurement; very low proportion of labour drive in manufacturing occupations however excessive proportion of inhabitants in skilled occupations; increased than common proportion of households with a college diploma; very low dwelling possession fee and really excessive proportion of inhabitants spending greater than 30% of revenue on housing prices; and better than common dwelling worth. Most of those DAs are situated within the provinces of Quebec, Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia.
Cluster 5 E DAs on this cluster have very excessive inhabitants density; comparatively excessive proportion of inhabitants 14 years of age and underneath; very excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households and really excessive proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; excessive unemployment fee; very excessive proportion of immigrants and up to date immigrant inhabitants; excessive proportion of labour drive working in gross sales and repair associated occupations; very low dwelling possession fee; and really low adjusted household revenue. DAs on this cluster are principally from the provinces of Quebec, Ontario and Alberta.
Cluster 6 F DAs on this cluster have excessive inhabitants density; very giant family measurement; very excessive proportion of immigrant inhabitants and really excessive proportion of seen minorities of South and East Asian origin; very excessive proportion of the inhabitants not talking both of the official languages of Canada; and really excessive dwelling worth. DAs on this cluster are principally from the Montreal, Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver CMAs.

5.3.2 Ten clusters answer

Degree two of the hierarchy creates ten clusters as an optimum cluster answer (Desk 2). The variety of DAs varies from a minimal of 1,260 to the utmost of seven,787. The median inhabitants density ranges from 1,834 to the utmost of 8,160 per sq. kilometre. The ten clusters developed are nested within the six clusters described above (see Desk 2). Due to this fact, the clusters in every stage share some traits with the upper stage of cluster to which they belong. The ten clusters have the traits as outlined beneath.




















Desk 4

Identify and outline of second stage of clusters

Desk abstract

This desk shows the outcomes of Identify and outline of second stage of clusters. The data is grouped by Cluster Quantity (showing as row headers), Cluster Identify and Cluster Description (showing as column headers).
Cluster Quantity Cluster Identify Cluster Description
Cluster 1 A1 DAs on this cluster are from the Canadian coast to coast with low inhabitants density; comparatively low proportion of low revenue households; low unemployment fee; low proportion of immigrant inhabitants and really low proportion of seen minority inhabitants; excessive dwelling possession fee; and excessive adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 2 A2 DAs on this cluster have comparatively giant household measurement; very low proportion of inhabitants receiving authorities switch of fee; comparatively low unemployment fee; excessive proportion of inhabitants working in managerial {and professional} occupations; and a really excessive proportion of households with a college diploma. This cluster has blended DAs from coast to coast with the best adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 3 A3 DAs on this cluster have comparatively excessive younger inhabitants aged 14 years and underneath however low proportion of inhabitants aged 65 years and above; comparatively giant family measurement; excessive proportion of households with a college diploma; excessive proportion of immigrant and visual minority inhabitants however low proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; comparatively excessive dwelling worth and excessive adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 4 B1 DAs on this cluster have low inhabitants density; small family measurement; comparatively excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households; low proportion of immigrant inhabitants however excessive proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; low dwelling worth. Though the DAs on this cluster are discovered all throughout the nation, many of the DAs from the territories and Northern areas of the provinces belong to this cluster.
Cluster 5 B2 DAs on this cluster have very small family measurement; very excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households, low revenue households and authorities switch of fee recipients; excessive unemployment fee; low proportion of immigrant inhabitants however excessive proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; very low proportion of family with a college diploma; excessive proportion of inhabitants working in gross sales and repair occupation however very low in managerial occupation; comparatively excessive proportion of dwellings in want of main restore; very low dwelling worth; and really low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 6 C1 DAs on this cluster have very small family measurement; very low proportion of inhabitants underneath the age of 14 however very excessive proportion of aged inhabitants aged 65 and above; very excessive proportion of institutionalized inhabitants; very excessive proportion of low revenue households; very excessive proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; low dwelling possession fee; and really low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 7 D1 DAs on this cluster have very excessive inhabitants density; very small family measurement; very low proportion of labour drive in manufacturing occupations however very excessive proportion in skilled occupations; increased than common proportion of family having a member with a college diploma; excessive proportion of immigrants; very low dwelling possession fee and really excessive proportion of inhabitants spending greater than 30% of revenue on housing prices; and better than common dwelling values. DAs on this cluster are principally from the provinces of Quebec, Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia.
Cluster 8 E1 DAs on this cluster have very excessive inhabitants density; comparatively excessive proportion of inhabitants underneath the age of 15; very excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households and really excessive proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; excessive unemployment fee; very excessive proportion of immigrant and up to date immigrant inhabitants; excessive proportion of labour drive working in gross sales and repair associated occupations; very low dwelling possession fee; and really low adjusted household revenue. DAs on this cluster are principally from the provinces of Quebec, Ontario and Alberta.
Cluster 9 F1 DAs on this cluster have comparatively excessive inhabitants density; very giant family measurement; excessive proportion of households having a member with a college diploma at bachelors stage or above; very excessive proportion of immigrant inhabitants; excessive proportion of seen minorities of East Asian origin; very low proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; comparatively very excessive proportion of inhabitants not talking both of the official languages of Canada; and really excessive median dwelling worth. DAs on this cluster are principally from Montreal, Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver CMA.
Cluster 10 F2 DAs on this cluster have excessive inhabitants density however comparatively low proportion of aged inhabitants 65 years of age and above; very giant family measurement; very excessive proportion of immigrant inhabitants; very excessive proportion of South Asian and Black seen minorities; very low proportion of inhabitants working in skilled occupations; and comparatively excessive dwelling worth. DAs on this cluster are principally from Ontario and British Columbia.

5.3.3 Twenty clusters answer

Degree three of the hierarchy creates twenty clusters as an optimum cluster answer. The twenty clusters developed are nested throughout the ten clusters which in flip are nested inside six clusters described above (see Desk 2). Due to this fact, the clusters in every stage share some traits with the earlier stage of cluster to which they belong. Within the twenty cluster answer, the variety of DAs in every cluster ranges from 847 to six,650 whereas the median inhabitants density ranges from 32 to 19,750 per sq. kilometre. The twenty clusters have the next traits.




























Desk 5

Identify and outline of third stage of clusters

Desk abstract

This desk shows the outcomes of Identify and outline of third stage of clusters. The data is grouped by Cluster Quantity (showing as row headers), Cluster Identify and Cluster Description (showing as column headers).
Cluster Quantity Cluster Identify Cluster Description
Cluster 1 A11 DAs on this cluster are from the Canadian coast to coast with low inhabitants density; comparatively low proportion of low revenue households; low proportion of immigrant inhabitants and really low proportion of seen minority inhabitants; low unemployment fee; excessive dwelling possession fee; and excessive adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 2 A21 DAs on this cluster have low inhabitants density; low proportion of lone dad or mum households; low proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; comparatively low proportion of low revenue households; excessive proportions in managerial {and professional} occupations; and excessive median dwelling worth and adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 3 A22 DAs on this cluster have giant family measurement; very low proportion of lone dad or mum household; the bottom proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; very low proportion of low revenue households; low unemployment fee; low proportion of Aboriginal and visual minority populations; highest dwelling possession fee; excessive dwelling worth; very excessive adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 4 A23 DAs on this cluster have comparatively excessive proportion of youngsters 14 years of age and underneath; very excessive proportion of households having a member with a college diploma; very low proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; low common unemployment fee; very excessive proportion of inhabitants working in managerial {and professional} occupations; very low proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; very excessive dwelling worth; very excessive adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 5 A31 DAs on this cluster have comparatively giant family measurement; low proportion of low revenue households; excessive proportion of immigrant inhabitants; comparatively low proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; comparatively excessive dwelling possession proportion and excessive adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 6 A32 DAs on this cluster have excessive inhabitants density; very giant family measurement; comparatively low proportion of lone dad or mum households; very excessive proportion of immigrant inhabitants however low proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; very excessive proportion of seen minority teams from South Asian and East Asian origin; excessive proportion of dwellings not appropriate for lodging; excessive dwelling worth; and comparatively excessive adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 7 B11 DAs on this cluster have comparatively small family measurement and excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households; very low proportion of households having a member with a college diploma; comparatively excessive proportion of inhabitants working in gross sales, service and manufacturing occupations; low proportion of immigrant inhabitants however excessive proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; low dwelling worth and excessive proportion of dwellings in want of main restore; low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 8 B12 DAs on this cluster have low inhabitants density; excessive proportion of youngsters 14 years of age and underneath however low proportion of seniors aged 65 years and over; low proportion of households having a member with a college diploma; very excessive proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants however low proportion of immigrants and visual minority inhabitants; comparatively excessive proportion of dwellings in want of main restore; comparatively low dwelling values.
Cluster 9 B13 DAs on this cluster have the bottom inhabitants density however excessive proportion of seniors aged 65 years and above; low proportion of lone dad or mum households; lowest proportion of households having a member with a college diploma; low proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; very low proportion of immigrants and visual minority inhabitants however excessive proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; comparatively low dwelling worth however excessive variability of the dwelling values.
Cluster 10 B21 DAs on this cluster have very small family measurement however very excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households; excessive proportion of low revenue households and authorities switch of fee recipients; very excessive unemployment fee; very excessive proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; very low proportion of the households personal their dwellings; very low dwelling worth and really low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 11 B22 DAs on this cluster have very excessive proportion of seniors however very low proportion of youngsters 14 years of age and underneath; very small family measurement; very excessive proportion of inhabitants with beneath highschool schooling; very excessive proportion of low revenue households and really excessive proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; excessive unemployment fee; low proportion of seen minority inhabitants; very low dwelling worth and really low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 12 C11 DAs on this cluster have very small family measurement; very low proportion of inhabitants 14 years of age and underneath however very excessive proportion of aged inhabitants aged 65 and above; very excessive proportion of institutionalized inhabitants; very excessive proportion of low revenue households; very excessive proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; low dwelling possession fee; and really low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 13 D11 DAs with very excessive inhabitants density however very low proportion of youngsters 14 years of age and underneath; very small family measurement; very excessive proportion of the inhabitants working in skilled occupations; excessive proportion of households having a member with a college diploma; very low proportion of the inhabitants personal their dwellings; excessive common dwelling worth.
Cluster 14 D12 DAs on this cluster have very low proportion of youngsters however very excessive proportion of seniors aged 65 years and above; very small family measurement; low proportion of lone dad or mum households; low proportion of inhabitants receiving authorities switch of fee; principally working in managerial {and professional} occupations; excessive variability of dwelling worth.
Cluster 15 D13 DAs on this cluster have very excessive inhabitants density however very low proportion of youngsters 14 years of age and underneath; excessive proportion of presidency switch recipients; excessive proportion of low revenue households; very excessive proportion of immigrant inhabitants and visual minorities of East Asians and West Asian origin; very excessive proportion of households spending greater than 30% on housing value; excessive median dwelling worth however very low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 16 E11 DAs on this cluster have excessive inhabitants density; low proportion of inhabitants aged 65 years and above; very excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households; comparatively excessive unemployment fee; very excessive proportion of current immigrant inhabitants; very excessive proportion of Latino and Black seen minorities; and really excessive proportion of dwellings not appropriate for occupancy.
Cluster 17 E12 DAs on this cluster have comparatively excessive inhabitants density; excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households and comparatively giant family measurement; excessive proportion of presidency switch of fee recipients; very excessive proportion of immigrant inhabitants; very excessive proportion of inhabitants not talking both of the official languages of Canada; very excessive proportion of Latino and Black seen minorities teams; principally working in gross sales and repair occupation; and comparatively excessive dwelling worth.
Cluster 18 E13 DAs on this cluster have very excessive inhabitants density; very excessive proportion of lone dad or mum households and excessive proportion of low revenue households; very excessive unemployment fee; very excessive proportion of immigrant and visual minority inhabitants however low proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; low proportion of households having a member with a college diploma; very excessive proportion of the households spending greater than 30% on housing value; very excessive proportion of dwellings not appropriate for occupancy; very low adjusted household revenue.
Cluster 19 F11 DAs on this cluster have low proportion of youngsters 14 years of age and underneath; very giant family measurement; excessive proportion of presidency switch recipients; very excessive proportion of immigrants; very low proportion of Aboriginal inhabitants; very excessive proportion of seen minority of East Asian origin; very excessive dwelling worth; excessive proportion of inhabitants with out the information of both of the official languages of Canada.
Cluster 20 F21 DAs on this cluster have excessive inhabitants density; comparatively low proportion of seniors aged 65 years and above; very giant family measurement; excessive proportion of households having a member with a college diploma; very excessive proportion of immigrant inhabitants; comparatively excessive unemployment fee; very excessive proportion of South Asian and Black seen minorities; comparatively excessive proportion of inhabitants working in gross sales and repair, and manufacturing occupations; comparatively excessive dwelling worth.

6. Methods to hyperlink the CanSET along with your knowledge

The CanSET is designed to make use of with any dataset for which the DA or postal code info is on the market.  The CanSET knowledge may be simply linked with different knowledge sources utilizing the dissemination space distinctive identification (DAUID) quantity from the Census of inhabitants 2016. DAUID from every other Census of inhabitants might have a correspondence file to match them with the 2016 Census DAUID. The information set that do not need DA info however have the postal code info can be linked with CanSET knowledge utilizing the Postal CodeOM Conversion File plus (PCCF+) produced by Statistics Canada.

The CanSET knowledge comes with a desk that features DAUID and hierarchal cluster membership for every of the three cluster options. The desk comprises 4 columns of DAUID, Cluster 6, Cluster 10 and Cluster 20 with numeric worth of 1 to six, 1 to 10 and 1 to twenty respectively as proven in a pattern desk (Desk 6) beneath.
















Desk 6

Instance rows of CanSET knowledge

Desk abstract

This desk shows the outcomes of Instance rows of CanSET knowledge. The data is grouped by DAUID (showing as row headers), PRUID, PRNAME, CMAUID, CMANAME, DAPOP2016, CanSET2016_6, CanSET2016_10 and CanSET2016_20 (showing as column headers).
DAUID PRUID PRNAME CMAUID CMANAME DAPOP2016 CanSET2016_6 CanSET2016_10 CanSET2016_20
10010213 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 1 St. John’s 730 D D1 D12
10010214 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 1 St. John’s 356 E E1 E11
10010215 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 1 St. John’s 381 B B2 B22
10010216 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 1 St. John’s 361 D D1 D11
10010217 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 1 St. John’s 319 B B1 B11
10010218 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 1 St. John’s 338 B B2 B21
10010219 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 1 St. John’s 632 B B2 B22
10010220 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 1 St. John’s 340 B B1 B11

7. Abstract and Conclusion

This person information supplies an summary of the methodology used to develop CanSET and supplies info on methods to use these social setting clusters with the customers personal well being or social knowledge. To create the CanSET Canadian DAs had been grouped collectively primarily based on their demographic construction, socioeconomic standing, and ethno-cultural background. The CanSET used 30 totally different variables from the Census of Inhabitants 2016 to categorise Canadian DAs into three nested ranges of clusters utilizing the Quick Ward hierarchical clustering methodology. The optimum variety of clusters had been decided at six, ten and twenty utilizing the Davies-Bouldin index. The median values had been calculated for every variables for every cluster answer and particular traits and names got to every cluster primarily based on the worth of the variables in every clusters.

The brand new CanSET portrays the complicated social composition of Canadian city geography.  The CanSET is extra complete because it consists of quite a lot of dimensions of city social setting and covers all populous areas of Canada. This research is exclusive because it embrace all DAs from the CMAs and CAs concurrently in a single typology moderately than analyzing them individually for every CMA or CA. The evaluation is predicated on the microdata from the Census of Inhabitants 2016 which covers all inhabitants of the research space. Due to this fact, the CanSET knowledge permits cities to make comparability inside themselves or with different cities and facilitates them to set benchmarks and observe progress in combating well being and social inequalities.

8. References

Davies, D. L., & Bouldin, D. W. (1987). A Cluster Separation Measure. IEEE Transactions on Patern Evaluation and Machine Intelligence, 1(2), 224-227.

Johnson, R., & Wicheren, D. (2007). Utilized Multivariate Statistical Evaluation (sixth ed.). Prentice Corridor.

SAS Institute Inc. (2016). JMP 13 Multivariate Strategies: Hierarchical Cluster. Cary, North Carolina, USA: SAS Institute Inc.

Statistics Canada. (2016). Dictionary, Census of Inhabitants. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/ref/dict/geo021-eng.cfm

Statistics Canada. (2018). Postal Code Conversion File Plus (PCCF+) Model 7B, Reference Information. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Appendix A






































Appendix A

Description of the variables included within the CanSET cluster evaluation

Desk abstract

This desk shows the outcomes of Description of the variables included within the CanSET cluster evaluation. The data is grouped by Variable identify (showing as row headers), Description and Universe and Remarks (showing as column headers).
Variable identify Description Universe and Remarks
PopDen Inhabitants density; complete variety of individuals per sq. kilometre of space. Contains all inhabitants
InstHlthShelt % of inhabitants which are institutionalized and residing in medical or long-term care amenities or shelters Contains all inhabitants
Pop14 % of inhabitants aged 0 to 14 years Contains all inhabitants
Pop65 % of inhabitants aged 65 and above Contains all inhabitants
HhldSize Common variety of individuals in a family Contains occupied non-public dwellings and models in senior residence however excludes different collective dwellings
LnePrnt % of lone dad or mum census households Contains occupied non-public dwellings and models in senior residence however excludes different collective dwellings
NoHghSch % of personal households with the best stage of schooling of all its members “no certificates, diploma or diploma” Contains variety of individuals aged 15 and over in occupied non-public households
UnivDgr % of personal households with a minimum of one member of the family having “college certificates, diploma or diploma at bachelor stage or above” Contains variety of individuals aged 15 and over in non-public households
Inc Family measurement adjusted median family revenue after tax Calculated because the median family revenue*variety of households in a DA/complete variety of households adjusted by the variety of individuals within the households
GovTrfs % of inhabitants receiving particular authorities transfers. Contains inhabitants aged 15 and over in an occupied non-public dwellings and models in senior residence however excludes different collective dwellings
UErate Unemployment fee for inhabitants aged 15 years and above Contains inhabitants aged 15 and above who had been obtainable for work however unemployed within the census reference week
OccMang % of employed labour drive in administration and administration occupation Contains inhabitants aged 15 and above who had been obtainable for work within the census reference week
OccManuf % of employed labour drive in manufacturing, building and commerce associated occupation Contains inhabitants aged 15 and above who had been obtainable for work within the census reference week
OccuProf % of employed labour drive in skilled occupation Contains inhabitants aged 15 and above who had been obtainable for work within the census reference week
Imm % of immigrant inhabitants Contains individuals in occupied non-public households. This query shouldn’t be requested in Indian Reserves.
RecImm % of current immigrant inhabitants (landed in Canada between 2011 and 2016) Contains individuals in occupied non-public households. This query shouldn’t be requested in Indian Reserves.
AboRate % of people that recognized themselves with Aboriginal peoples of Canada Contains respondents to this query in occupied non-public households.
VisMin % of people that recognized themselves as belonging to a visual minority group Contains respondents to this query in occupied non-public households.
SthAsn % of individuals belonging to South Asian seen minority group Contains respondents to the seen minority query in occupied non-public households.
EastAsn % of individuals belonging to Chinese language, Filipino, Southeast Asian, Korean or Japanese seen minority teams Contains respondents to the seen minority query in occupied non-public households.
Black % of individuals belonging to Black seen minority group Contains respondents to the seen minority query in occupied non-public households.
Latino % of individuals belonging to Latin American seen minority group Contains respondents to the seen minority query in occupied non-public households.
ArbWstAsn % of individuals belonging to Arab or West Asian seen minority teams Contains respondents to the seen minority query in occupied non-public households.
NoOffLang % with no information of both of official languages Contains all inhabitants
OwnDwl % of personal dwellings occupied by proprietor Contains households that personal or lease their non-public dwelling. Excluded is shelter occupancy on Indian reserves or setttlements.
HouNONAff % of households spending greater than 30% of its common complete revenue shelter prices This variable is calculated for personal households residing in owned or rented dwellings who reported a complete family revenue better than zero. Excluded are band housing, farm dwellings.
DwNotSutab % of personal households residing in not appropriate lodging (in line with the Nationwide Occupancy Customary) A dwelling is taken into account appropriate if it has sufficient bedrooms for the scale and composition of the family. Contains solely non-public households.
DwRpair % of occupied non-public dwellings in want of main repairs Contains solely occupied non-public dwellings
DwValue Common worth of privately owned dwellings Contains solely occupied non-public dwellings
Relative_iqrDV Measure of variability in dwelling worth inside a DA Contains solely occupied non-public dwellings




Report an issue on this web page


Is one thing not working? Is there info outdated? Cannot discover what you are on the lookout for?

Please contact us and tell us how we may help you.

Privateness discover


Date modified:


Authorities of Canada






Supply hyperlink